THE CHALLENGES OF UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING IN AFRICA:  CASE STUDY OF SOMALIA

 

 

BY

 

COMMANDER SO AGADA

 

 

NIGERIAN NAVY

 

 

A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNITED NATIONS INSTITUTE FOR TRAINING AND RESEARCH, IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF CERTIFICATE OF TRAINING IN PEACE SUPPORT OPERATIONS (CITOPSO)

 

JANUARY  2008

                     ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 

I wish to first and foremost thank the Almighty God for his strength, grace and mercy in accomplishing this work. All that we know is a sum total of what we have learned from all who have taught us, either directly or indirectly.

 

I am forever indebted to the countless outstanding men and women who by their commitment and dedication to becoming the best they could be, have inspired me to do the same. In this wise I wish to sincerely thank my Thesis Advisor, Commodore Darius Onimole (Rtd), Pastor Paul Adefarasin my pastor and a host of others who space would not permit me to mention. I also thank Colonel Emeka Okonkwo, Major Victor Briggs (Rtd) and Susan Tarrien for their effort in facilitating my Thesis fees payment. My appreciation also goes to Harvey Langholtz, the Director UNITAR, the various Course Authors and other staff of the Institute for their services.

 

Finally I wish to say that, I am also deeply mindful of and thankful for the unparallel love, prayer, support and patience of my precious wife Mary and our daughters, Treasure and Divine during this work.

 

 

 

 

 

                           CERTIFICATION

 

 

 This is to certify that this work was carried out by Solomon Onyilo Agada under my supervision.

                                                                                                             

                                  Thesis Advisor      

                   

                     Commodore Darius F. Onimole, rtd

                  FSS,MSS,DSS,fellowofwarCollege(fwc),psc(+),           M.Sc Political Science(StrategicStudies)-University of Ibadan.  

 

January 2008.

 

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                  PAGE (S)

TITLE PAGE …..……………………………………………………   i 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ………..……………………………….    ii

CERTIFICATION ………………..……………………………….    iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………. iv-vii

LIST OF TABLES/FIGURES …………………………………… vii-ix

ABBREVIATIONS ………………..………………………………. x-xv

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY …………………………….….......  xvi-xix

 

CHAPTER ONE

 

INTRODUCTION                                     PAGE (S)

 

BACKGROUND ………………………………………………………. 1-4

STATEMENT OF THE RESEARCH PROBLEM ………………. 5-7

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY ……………………………………… 7-8

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY ………………………………… 8

RESEARCH DESIGN ……………………………….……………….  9

INSTRUMENT FOR DATA COLLECTION …………………….. 9

VALIDITY/RELIABILITY OF INSTRUMENT ………………… 10

METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS …………………………………  11

 

SCOPE OF THE STUDY ………………………………………… 11

LIMITATIONS ……………………………………………………… 11-12

DEFINITION OF TERMS ………………………………………   12-16

NOTES AND REFERENCES ……………………………………  17-20

 

CHAPTER TWO

 

LITERATURE REVIEW                             PAGE (S)

 

CONCEPT OF CONFLICT ……………………………………….. 21-27

THEORIES OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION ………………….. 28-30

CONCEPT OF PREVENTIVE DIPLOMACY ..………………… 30-32

CONCEPT OF PEACEKEEPING ………………...……………… 32-39

NOTES AND REFERENCES ……………………………....       40-44

 

CHAPTER THREE

 

CASE STUDY OF SOMALIA                               PAGE (S)

 

BACKGROUND AND CAUSES OF THE

CONFLICT IN SOMALIA ………………………………………… 45-47

UNITED NATIONS INTERVENTION IN SOMALIA …..… 48-52

NOTES AND REFERENCES …………………………………….. 53

 

CHAPTER FOUR

 

CHALLENGES TO UNITED NATIONS               PAGE (S)

PEACEKEEPING IN AFRICA AND

THE WAY FORWARD

 

PREAMBLE ………………………………………………………. 54-55

SLOW RATE OF UNITED NATIONS

PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS DEPLOYMENT …………. 55-58

NON ROBUST MANDATE ………………………………………. 58

INEFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT OF ARMS EMBARGO …. 58-59

INADEQUATE MANPOWER AND LOGISTICS ……………. 59-62

NON COOPERATION OF WARLORDS ………………………. 62-63

NON TACKLING OF ROOT CAUSES OF CONFLICT …….. 63

NON PARTICIPATION OF TROOPS FROM

DEVELOPED NATIONS …………..……………………………… 64-66

UNDERSTANDING SENITIVITY OF THE PEOPLE ……... 66-67

RAPID DEPLOYMENT CAPABILITY ………………………..... 67-68

ROBUST OPEATIONAL MANDATES …………………..…….. 68-69

ACQUIRING TROOPS FROM DEVELOPED NATIONS …. 69-71

EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT OF ARMS EMBARGO …….. 72-73

COMMITMENT AND COOPERATION OF

THE WARLORDS  ………………………………………………... 73-74

ADEQUATE FUNDING AND LOGISTICS ………………….. 74-75

ENDNOTES AND REFERENCES ………………………………. 76-79

 

CHAPTER FIVE

 

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS     PAGE (S)

 

CONCLUSION ……………………………………………………... 80-83

RECOMMENDATIONS …………………………………………… 84

ENDNOTES  …………………………………………… 85-93

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES

 

Serial

Title of Table

Page No(s)

(a)

(b)

(c)

1.

 

 

2.

Past and Present United Nations Peacekeeping Operations in Africa.

 

Differences between Settlement and Resolution approaches to Conflict.

         

          4

 

 

         28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES

 

Serial

Title of Figure

Page No(s)

(a)

(b)

(c)

1.

 

2.

 Conflict Triangle

 

Ongoing United Nations Peacekeeping

Missions

22

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ABBREVIATIONS

 

 

       AHQ        -      Army Headquarters

       AU          -      African Union

       AMISOM  -      African Union Mission in Somalia

       CAR        -      Central African Republic

CNN        -      Cable News Network

       BBC        -      British Broadcasting Corporation

       BINUB     -      United Nations Integrated Office in

                             Burundi

       Brig Gen  -      Brigadier General

       CoG        -      Centre of Gravity

       Col          -      Colonel

       DP          -      Decisive Point

       DPKO      -      Department of Peacekeeping Operations

       DRC        -      Democratic Republic of Congo

       ECOMOG  -      Economic Community of West African

States Monitoring Group 

       ECOWAS  -      Economic Community of West African

States

       ED          -      Editor

       EU          -      European Union

       FC          -      Force Commander

       GA          -      General Assembly

       ICG         -      International Crisis Group

       IDPs        -      Internally Displaced Persons

       IGAD       -      Intergovernmental Authority on

Development

       ISS         -      Institute of Security Studies

       Lt Col      -      Lieutenant Colonel

       Maj Gen   -      Major General

       MILOBs   -      Military Observers

       MINURCA       -      United Nations Mission in the Central Africa Republic.

       MINURSO       -      United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara.

      MINUSTAH       -      United Nations Stabilisation Mission in Haiti.

      MONUC    -      United Nations Mission in Democratic

Republic of Congo

       NA          -      Nigerian Army

       NGOs      -      Non Governmental Organisations

       NIIA        -      Nigeria Institute of International Affairs

OAU        -      Organization of African Unity

       OIOS       -      Office of Internal Oversight Services

       ONUB      -      United Nations Mission in Burundi

       ONUC      -      United Nations Operation in Congo

       ONUMOZ -      United Nations Operation in

Mozambique

       PKO        -      Peace-Keeping Operation

       PM          -      Prime Minister

PSO        -      Peace Support Operations

       RTD        -      Retired

       SADC      -      Southern African Development

Community

       SAIIA      -      South Africa Institute of International

Affairs

       SALW      -      Small Arms and Light Weapons

       SC          -      Security Council

       SG          -      Secretary General

      SLOC       -      Sea Lanes Of Communication 

      SOFA       -      Status Of Forces Agreement

    

SRSG      -      Special Representative of the

Secretary General

       TCC        -      Troop Contributing Countries

       TFG        -      Transitional Federal Government

       UK          -      United Kingdom

       UN          -      United Nations

       UNAMA    -      United Nations Mission in Afganistan

       UNAMIR   -      United Nations Mission in Rwanda

       UNAMIS   -      United Nations Mission in Sudan

UNASOG  -      United Nations Aouzou Strip Observer  Group

       UNAMSIL -      United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone

UNAVEM  -      United Nations Angolan Verification    Mission

UNDOF    -      United Nations Disengagement Observer        Force

       UNEF      -      United Nations Emergency Force

UNIFIL    -      United Nations Interim Force in        

Lebanon

UNITARPOCI   -      United Nations Institute for  Training and Research Programme of Correspondence Instructions.

UNMEE      -    United Nations Mission in Ethiopia/Eritrea

UNFICYP -      United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus

       UNMIK     -      United Nations Mission in Iraq-Kuwait

       UNMIL     -      United Nations Mission in Liberia

       UNMIS     -      United Nations Mission in the Sudan

UNMIT     -     United Nations Intergrated Mission in Timor- Leste.

UNMOGIP -     United Nations Military Observer Group in India and       Pakistan.

       UNOCI     -      United Nations Mission in Corte D' Ivoire

       UNOMIG -      United Nations Observer Mission in

Georgia.

UNOMIL   -     United Nations Observer Mission in Liberia

UNOMSIL -      United Nations Observer Mission in

Sierra Leone

       UNOSOM -      United Nations Operation in Somalia.

       UNSC      -      United Nations Security Council

UNSCR    -      United Nations Security Council  Resolution

UNTAG    -      United Nations Transition Assistance Group

UNTSO    -      United Nations Truce Supervision Organisation

       USA        -      United States of America

       USC        -      United Somalia Council

       USIP       -      United States Institute for Peace

       USSR      -      Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                        EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

       The desire to carry out this study emanated from the realization that within the 62 years of existence of the UN, it has established about 61 PKOs, with Africa accounting for the highest number of these missions.   Unfortunately, only few of these PKOs have been successfully handled or resulted in lasting peace.

 

       This study first examines the history, theory and concept of conflict, conflict resolution and peacekeeping, and then made use of the Somalia crisis to generalise the demanding task of UN PKO in Africa.   The main focus was to identify the likely impediment and critical areas to this phenomenon as well as proffer strategies to making humanitarian interventions and/or PKOs more effective, especially in Africa.

 

       The study established that the paucity of some deliberate or careful steps that need to be taken to consolidate and sustain peace generally may be the greatest challenges to PKO in Africa. These include the need for robust and timely operational mandate, and where or when desirable, effective enforcement of arms embargo. Others include rapid deployment capability, commitment and co-operation of the belligerents and understanding the sensitivity of would-be recipients, amongst other essential details.

 

       Also, within its first sixty years of existence, it is observed that there had been only two clear-cut cases of what had originally been proclaimed as the UN's most important function: its capacity to marshal military power against aggression - the invasion of South Korea by North Korea in 1950, and the response of the UN to it under Chapter VII of the Charter - authorizing a full military action under the UN Flag and under US command against the North Korean attack. During this time the erstwhile USSR had boycotted all UN meetings in protest against the People's Republic of China being excluded from China's seat in the United Nations. This allowed US President Harry Truman a free hand at the Security Council. The second was in 1990 with the Cold War restrictions over, the Security Council unanimously and immediately authorized again, under US command, a coalition to eject Saddam Hussein's forces from Kuwait.

 

       The operations in Korea and Iraq achieved their objectives - the former with great military sacrifice - mainly due to very clear and timely mandate, with far enough and readily available needed military resources. On the other hand, the United State's intervention in Somalia in 1992-93 was partly successful due to what can be classified as erroneous strategy of statecraft. The US had started with coercive diplomacy - or forceful persuasion - through a threat to react with overwhelming military force should the Somali warlords (who had been using starvation of civilians as a means of waging war), opposed the US humanitarian relief intervention to bring food to over 2 million starving population. Once that phase of intervention proved successful, then the United Nations, through the backing of Clinton's administration, undertook a much more broader mandate - the reconstruction of the Somali Government, along with a dangerous and precarious attempt at disarming of the warlords' militias - but with a force far smaller than the one used to stop the starvation. Consequently our study attempted some suggestions to these dilemmas and proffered remedies in order to improve the capacity to manage future UN PKOs in Africa, with derivable recommendations that the USA and other major developed powers should be urgently encouraged and motivated to deploy troops for PKOs in Africa, despite the unfortunate disaster of 1993 in Somalia. And that the United Nations should henceforth seek to ensure effective implementation of arms embargo it imposes on warring parties.  Finally, that the UN in conjunction with TCC should ensure proper training of all peacekeepers in the art of conflict management, logistics planning and other field operational techniques before their deployment to mission areas.

     


CHAPTER ONE

 

1.00 INTRODUCTION

 

1.01 Background

 

As it is well known, the UN was formed after the Second World War primarily, among other reasons to maintain international peace and security.1 The founders of the UN had not foreseen the possibility of engaging in PKOs thus, PKO was not mentioned in the original UN Charter.  However, a former UNSG, Dag Hammarskjold referred to it as “Chapter VI and half”.2 This is because it falls between provisions of Chapter VI of the Charter which provides for pacific settlement of disputes and Chapter VII which enables enforcement actions by the UNSC. Implementation of these Chapters relies largely on the consensus of the SC’s permanent members namely China, France, USSR now Russia Federation, the UK and the USA.3

 

Until the end of the Cold War, the increasing disagreement between the then 2 super powers made this collective security system unworkable, this led to the conception of PKOs. Under the collective security system, when dispute arises between 2 governments, the parties concerned are obligated to seek a solution by peaceful means. This is under Chapter VI of the UN Charter mainly by, negotiation, reconciliation, mediation, arbitration, peaceful settlement or resort to regional agencies. 

 

If the peaceful means fail and the dispute escalates into an armed conflict, then Chapter VII of the UN Charter comes into play.4  This constitutes the core of the UN Collective Security System.  It provides that in the case of a threat to the peace, breach of the peace or an act of aggression the SC may take enforcement measures to restore international peace in such situations. These measures are essentially, arms embargoes, complete or partial economic sanctions, severance of diplomatic relations, and in the last resort the use of force.  

 

UNEF, the first actual UN peacekeeping operations was formed in 1956  during the Suez Canal Crisis5.  It provided the model for classical peacekeeping which requires the consent of the protagonists, impartiality on the part of UN forces and resort to use of arms only in self defence.  The immediate objective of this classical form of peacekeeping was to facilitate conditions for a more comprehensive peace agreement.6Besides UN peacekeeping in Africa, AU, ECOWAS and SADC have also contributed significantly to peacekeeping efforts in the continent.    Table 1 shows the list of past and present UN PKOs in Africa.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.02 TABLE 1. PAST AND PRESENT UNITED NATIONS  PEACEKEEPING  OPERATIONS IN AFRICA

 

Serial

Mission

Duration

(a)

(b)

(c)

1.

ONUC

Jul 60 - Jun 64

2.

UNEF I

Nov 56 - Jan 67

3.

UNEF II

Oct 73 - Jul 79

4.

UNAVEM 1

Jan 89 - May 91

5.

UNOSOM 1

Apr 92 - Sep 93

6.

UNASOG

May 94 –Jun 94

7.

UNOMUR

Jun 93 - Sep 94

8.

UNOMIL

Sep 93 – Sep 94

9.

ONUMOZ

Dec 92 - Dec 94

10.

UNAVEM II

May 91 – Feb 95

11.

UNOSOM II

Mar 93 - Mar 95

12.

UNAMIR

Oct 93 - Mar 96

13.

UNAVEM III

Feb 95 – Jul 97

14.

MONUA

Jun 97- Feb 99

15.

UNOMSIL

Jul 88 – Oct 99

16.

MINURCA

Apr 98- Feb 00

17.

MONUC

Nov 99 – Till date

18.

MINURSO

Apr 91 – Till date

19.

UNAMSIL

Oct 99- Dec 05

20.

ONUB

Jun 04- Dec 06

21.

UNMEE

Jul 00- Till date

22.

MINUCI

May 03-Apr 04

22.

UNMIL

Sep 03- Till date

23.

UNOCI

Aug 04- Till date

24.

UNMIS

Mar 05- Till date

25.

BINUB

Dec 06- Till date

 

Source: http://www.un.org

1.03  Statement of the Research Problem

The UN has played a vital role in mediating peace agreements and assisting in their implementation, helping to reduce the level of conflict in several regions especially in Africa. However, some of those accords failed to take hold then, such as in Angola in 1993 and Rwanda in 1994.7 Additionally, the current situations in Cote D’ Ivoire, Darfur-Sudan, DRC and Somalia unfortunately have not changed too positively. This has resulted in severe IDPs and refugee problems further compounding the security situation in and around such conflict areas.

It is estimated that roughly half of all countries that emerge from war lapse back into violence within 5 years due to some challenges.8 This drives home the point that, to prevent conflict, peace agreements must be implemented in a sustained manner. Most of these conflicts are known to be contagious and thus have spill-over effects to other nations while new ones are also unfolding, such as in CAR, Chad and Guinea. All these complex crises cry out for UN intervention. Meanwhile, there was already the problem of the World Body having taken on too many missions in recent times; for example, within 1988 to 1994 alone, the number of blue-helmeted troops had increased from 9,570 to 73,393 and an exponential soaring in the peace operations budget from $230 million to $3.6 billion.9 It is in view of the foregoing that this study seeks to address the challenges of PKOs in Africa after the end of the Cold War with particular emphasis on Somalia.

Moreover, until very recently, it is well known that there has been a systematic neglect of Africa security matters by the trio of France, UK and USA since after the Cold War.10 This makes it necessary for Africans to properly understand the ongoing global reforms to ensure lasting solution to their conflicts. Kofi Annan the immediate past UNSG reiterated this position by advising member states of the UN to seek alternative remedies of handling conflicts in their various regions.11 Mr Tony Blair as British PM, also declared same position while commenting on the situation in Zimbabwe for African leaders to act.12 

 

Since conflicts are intrinsically bound to occur, Africans must begin to address issues that will enable them manage conflicts in the continent effectively in concert with the UN. This study will therefore seek to answer the following pertinent questions:

       Why has conflict situations in Africa increased after the Cold War?

       What is the common nature and underlying causes of these conflicts?

       What are the challenges facing UN PKOs in Africa and how can these challenges be tackled?

 

1.04 Objective of the Study.  The purpose of the study is to examine the challenges of UN peacekeeping efforts in Africa.  However, the specific objectives of the study are:

       To identify the challenges confronting UN peacekeeping in Africa using UN PKO in Somalia         in 1991 as a case study.

 

       To design strategies towards effective UN peacekeeping in Africa.

 

1.05 Significance of the Study.   Following the end of the Cold War, there were renewed calls for the UN to become the agency for achieving world peace, as several dozen military conflicts continue to rage around the globe. With this, there has been an increased need for peacekeeping in Africa due to increased conflict situations in the continent.13 With the seemingly lax attitude of some major players in the UN towards African security,14 the continent’s security issues needs to be addressed adequately by Africans in conjunction with the UN. 

 

This study therefore, is expected to benefit researchers, analysts, and policy makers in formulating a framework to overcome the challenges of UN PKO in Africa for successful future peacekeeping. Furthermore it is hoped that its findings could stimulate further research in the field of UN PKOs.  The study would also contribute to existing body of knowledge in the field of peacekeeping.

 

 

 

1.06 Research Design.  The study considered that UN PKOs in Africa is plagued by some challenges. It also considered that even though UN PKOs started in Africa about 50 years ago, it is still not as successful as it should have been. Consequently, the research was designed as a case study using the conflict situation in Somalia to bring out the general challenges facing UN PKOs in Africa. The background and UN interventions in the conflict shall be highlighted to bring forth the challenges accordingly. Furthermore, the research sought to proffer strategies to overcome the challenges facing UN PKOs in Africa to ensure successful PKO leading to sustainable peace in Africa.

 

 

1.07 Instruments for Data Collection.  The instruments used for data collection were books, magazines, journals, newspapers and the internet. Other instruments used were, the electronic media, published and unpublished materials from libraries. Personal interviews and discussion with resource persons were also used.

 

 

1.08 Validity/Reliability of Instruments.  In order to ensure the validity of the instruments used for data collection, they were subjected to scrutiny. This was to eliminate any trace of bias or prejudice. Furthermore, various information obtained were crosschecked with independent sources for fair assessment and authenticity.

 

Where traces of bias or prejudice were found such data were discarded. In the case of oral interviews, conscious efforts were made to distinguish facts from personal opinions. This necessitated in-depth analysis.

 

1.09 Method of Data Analysis.  Information obtained were analysed qualitatively to arrive at the synthesis presented. However, in some instances, historical, descriptive and comparative approaches were adopted. Data obtained from interviews and discussions with resource persons were analyzed in a descriptive form.

 

 

 

 

1.10 Scope of Study.  The study examines the civil war and UN PKO in Somalia. This is because of its peculiar characteristics, its strategic position in the horn of Africa and its uniqueness in many respects.  For the first time, the UN maintained a peace mission in a country without a government; this was not without consequences. For instance due to lack of understanding of the concept of the second generation peacekeeping, the mission was faced with severe political and operational difficulties.

 

 The study will also draw examples from UN PKOs in Africa within the pre and post Cold War era and considers strategies that could be used to improve future UN peacekeeping in Africa. It is assumed that the UN will continue to employ peacekeeping as a means of conflict resolution generally, especially in Africa.